Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BuiltPowerStrokeTough, post: 1484766, member: 14650"] I think some of the guys who rebuild these engines daily should probably chime in though with what theyve seen on the 16s first before the assumptions are made. Hell, we dont even know when/if the 17s had any different rods put in them. Hopefully someone can get some hard evidence of the changes made and when. Then theres a whole new aspect once thats found. Are these updated rods better or worse than the old style? Be interesting to find all this out in the coming months/years once the guys who deal with these every day can shed some light on it. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

truck29

IMAG0331

Smokyred

SSBC Brakes

IMG_20150615_221048017_HDR

0102

2012 f250 sagging

efi_intake

efi_vs_dd

eleanor_part_two_84_

Out with the bad in with the good.

Latest posts

Y
Performance shops
- Latest: Yojih123
- Today at 12:31 AM
7.3 Performance
Indiana
- Latest: glog
- Yesterday at 10:20 AM
6.4 Tech
Will a 1996 F6TZ-9A451-F engine wiring harness work on a 1997 f250 HD ?
- Latest: NotThatGuy
- Yesterday at 12:45 AM
94-97 Aftermarket
I
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: INFRNL
- Sunday at 4:05 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
N
Do not recommend Choate Engineering
- Latest: Novapower62
- Sunday at 10:56 AM
Newly Enlisted

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 771 (members: 0, guests: 771)

Top