Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
6.7 Aftermarket
6.7 Twin Turbo Setup
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Wayne, post: 1179775, member: 863"] I know you asked Morgan, but perhaps I'll give my $.02 anyway, then he can elaborate or correct me. All a stud will do is clamp harder than a bolt. If caps are moving due to the block flexing under high torque applications, then they should make it harder for that to happen. It hasn't been happening on anything of Dan's I've seen. Definitely not on the stock, and near stock stuff I see regularly at the stealership. So if caps aren't moving now, going to studs won't make a difference. Going to studs will do nothing to improve rigidity of the block if the block itself is flexing, but the caps are staying put. As far as "crank flex" is concerned, it's probably a sloppy explanation of block flex potentially causing the crank to get bound in there when it flexes, making the main journals no longer line up. To control block flex, it needs reinforcing material to hold them all together, such as a girdle or bedplate. I m not hating on anyone by any means because I see nothing wrong with a good main stud. I'd like to see failures first where the caps move to personally justify the expense, but again, nothi g wrong with stronger parts. The crank on the 6.7's is actually pretty stout. Main journal diameter is about the same as on a 6.0, and rods are a larger diameter. I'll post a pic in a minute comparing the two. Anyway, I just don't see broken cranks now job 1 manufacturing flaws are a thing of the past, and rare at that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
10R140 failure
Latest: PSD-BLACK-CLOUD
Friday at 1:04 PM
2017+ 6.7 Aluminum Super Duty
2010 headunit
Latest: glog
Wednesday at 1:17 PM
6.4 Tech
D
Turning off the Auxiliary powertrain control module
Latest: donaldtfreeman
Tuesday at 10:43 AM
6.0 Tech & FAQ
4r100 P0715/P0717 trouble codes.
Latest: Tiha
Tuesday at 8:07 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
I must be getting old… Exhaust is too loud
Latest: ju015dd
May 4, 2025
6.0 Aftermarket
Members online
No members online now.
Forums
Power Strokes
6.7 Aftermarket
6.7 Twin Turbo Setup
Top