Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Charles, post: 1329396, member: 103"] Zero wouldn't work, the universe would implode.... but 1.00 would. I would actually like to do that if it weren't for the fact that aside from that table and the "adder to pulsewidth multiplier" table, there's no way to achieve a starting fuel allowance that doesn't also translate into more fuel when up to temp. If you bomb the program with tons of pulsewidth, this is a non-issue. The truck smokes like a train and cranks fine no matter what. If however you set the pulsewidth correctly for the power you intend to make and the truck sprints around clean.... it won't have enough available fuel to crank quickly and reliably in cold weather. It's like having no choke on a gasser. No way to increase the fuel FOR CRANKING ONLY. And yes.... there is an "Adder to pulsewidth multiplier". Yes, that is a modifier table, to modify a modifier table, that's modifying a table......... :doh: I wish the fuel pulsewidth multiplier table was simply EOT vs RPM, then the problem would be solved. Cranking fuel out the wazoo and nothing more. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

2012-04-24_18-46-02_422

The Truck

20170409_175923

Hydroboost and power steering

CIMG00271

OBS_before_and_after

193474_196574997029461_100000308874737_610002_1926299_o1

Stuck_as_F_K

P1060067

549994_3903693771203_1518534086_n-2

Latest posts

A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Yesterday at 10:49 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
Ford 7.3 Passenger Bank Dead
- Latest: 6.0 Tech
- Monday at 8:52 AM
7.3 Tech
Georgia Roll Call
- Latest: RascalMafia
- Sunday at 2:52 PM
Southeast US
Stage 2 LPFS for a 6.0 Powerstroke
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Friday at 11:58 PM
Engine and Drivetrain
0
6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: 06Mike
- Friday at 2:44 PM
Aftermarket Performance

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,272 (members: 0, guests: 1,272)

Top