dual 6637 intake

goodie85 · May 20, 2012

What do yall think

All complete

4.0l sahara · May 20, 2012

Nice! But is this really needed?

96stacked&smoken · May 20, 2012

I cant see a stock turbo needing that much are but looks good.:toast:

goodie85 · May 21, 2012

Yea the other mods are waiting on money, and id say for 80 bucks the hell not do two, compared to 60, for a single, I'm seeing average 70* degrees lower egts compared to just one as well

goodie85 · May 21, 2012

I ran just one for a day running tests zero to sixty and zero to eighty then added the second and seen average 70* lower, just to clarify I did tests, also I have the zoodad mod done so I'm assuming that's why is lower

ToMang07 · May 21, 2012

Neat! If I ever get a big snail on there I may look into something like that. :toast:

goodie85 · May 21, 2012

thats the main reason I did it, I have big dreams. But either way I'm happy I did it this way

lincolnlocker · May 21, 2012

Hey that looks familiar! Looks good man!

That is just a plate on top and not a full box right?

never mind, i looked on my comp and saw that its just a plate...

and to everyone else, i have ran the same tests many many times and have had the dual filters on my truck for over a year... but i did this with the two donaldson filters a couple weeks ago... its way better this way then with pretty much any cone/high flow filters... and not a stitch of dust in the intake now... quicker spool ups and lower egt's... just as goodie is stating.

PowerstrokeJunkie · May 21, 2012

No matter how many filters you put under the hood, nothing beats running no filter

01stroked · May 21, 2012

AGREED kris lol 175 miles of driving in a circle f***in with ppl haha

PowerstrokeJunkie · May 21, 2012

01stroked said:
AGREED kris lol 175 miles of driving in a circle f***in with ppl haha

PatriotHauling · May 22, 2012

I've begun to become a skeptic of the 6637 lately. Mostly for CFMs. Its rated lower than the stock filter, and the loud hissing noise we all are familiar with sounds to me like air being sucked through a restriction.

This dual 6637 would increase CFMs so that would make me a happy camper, but I am thinking about an AIS personally.

But this is pretty neat. I like things that are unique and done just to be unique.

lincolnlocker · May 22, 2012

PatriotHauling said:
I've begun to become a skeptic of the 6637 lately. Mostly for CFMs. Its rated lower than the stock filter, and the loud hissing noise we all are familiar with sounds to me like air being sucked through a restriction.

This dual 6637 would increase CFMs so that would make me a happy camper, but I am thinking about an AIS personally.

But this is pretty neat. I like things that are unique and done just to be unique.

Just so you know, johnathan(bdptuner) at beans took a nasty dirty 6637 and dynoed a truck with it and made 400hp. he then removed the 6637 and dynoed again and ran the same exact numbers... just because the cfm rating scares you as it did me in the begining doesnt mean that the volume of the filter wont be enough... yes i thought the same thing at first then wasted money on numerous cone filters that dusted my intake and started to shine my compressor wheel, i switched back to donaldsons... i have a post on here also about the two bhaf that i did a few weeks ago that goodie got the idea for this.... he is seeimg the same benifits as i did even though one of these filters are good enough for a 7.3, two is better... and yes i like uniqueness myself but if everyone with a 7.3 can benefit from it, why not share it with the world as i did... btw with a 38r you cant hear that sucking noise.