Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SpartanDieselTech, post: 1347577, member: 22311"] This is about the best comparison I've read so far. Lined up side-by-side in a boosted launch, the 2015/2016 6.7 will outrun the 6.4L to 60 or so, and the 6.4 runs a bit stronger from 60 to 100. All in all I believe they turn very similar 1/4 mile times. As far as spooling and response- keep in mind that the 6.7L is running a turbo pretty close in size to the 6.4L low pressure charger, and has to spool it without the assistance from a second unit. This does mean, as described above, it isn't as "snappy" in feel. Also, as noted above, some of the lack of response is electronics. We can reduce that (and are playing around with it) but in doing so, it will reduce some of the smoothness and induce touchy throttle, as with the 6.4. For most users, I don't see it being worth the trade-off. When it comes down to it, both a late model 6.7 and a 6.4 will make almost identical power. The 6.7 has about a 200ft/lb edge in torque, and the 6.4L has a powerband that's 300 to 350 rpm longer. Hence why, despite the difference in feel, they perform so similar. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

Bushwacker "Extend-A-Fender" flares

IMG_3520_1_

2011

1997 ZF5 DRW

SHAQ

20170409_205701

The Truck

photo_6

18x9_xd_riots_falken_325_60r18_rocky_mountain_ats_tires

FB_IMG_1524919612076

170634_185246084829019_100000308874737_536104_4515483_o

Latest posts

Ford 7.3 Passenger Bank Dead
- Latest: 6.0 Tech
- Yesterday at 7:22 PM
7.3 Tech
J
6.4 spartan
- Latest: jmathews90
- Yesterday at 6:16 PM
6.4 Performance
Show & Go/Going to Try this Out combo Build
- Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
- Yesterday at 9:06 AM
6.4 Aftermarket
Y
Fuel sending unit and wheel studs
- Latest: Yojih123
- Yesterday at 1:00 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: ju015dd
- Wednesday at 10:39 PM
6.7 Tech

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 691 (members: 0, guests: 691)

Top