Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morgan@Midwest Diesel & Auto, post: 1126781, member: 8143"] The 64mm with 2015 factory pump, SS piping kit, big down pipe, no-limit cai, wastegate and tuning. The 68 I just put in. It hasn't even seen wot because the trans is slipping. The rods will not be safer with the 68 vs 64. They both spool about the same. I don't have ANY data on the 68 because it has only drove 10 miles at best. All I can say is ebp may be a hair bit lower but I have no idea until I get a trans in there that holds power. But to answer your question, the 68 is going to make a lot more power, with added fuel pushing close to 700hp, no, I doubt it's better on rods. The 64 will make less power and doesn't spool any quicker so I don't see any issues with rods at all. I am going to be beating my truck with big pumps and 68 or 71 mm turbo. But I'd like to keep it together if at all possible. So I will be monitoring everything and keeping everything in the safest zone possible. We all know that adding fuel and power levels 700+ are pushing the safe zone way past its limits. But only time will tell. I will report back more as I get stuff done. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

tearing her down

016_2_

Truck

HX40 map

IMAG0529

Magneto_front_pre-ptm_v2

fuel_cell_2

truck1

1005151631

2008 FX4

Latest posts

A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Today at 8:00 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
Stage 2 LPFS for a 6.0 Powerstroke
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Yesterday at 11:58 PM
Engine and Drivetrain
0
6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: 06Mike
- Yesterday at 2:44 PM
Aftermarket Performance
Florida...
- Latest: Mark Kovalsky
- Wednesday at 10:22 AM
Southeast US
American made up-pipes?
- Latest: Powerstroke Racer
- Wednesday at 9:03 AM
7.3 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,103 (members: 0, guests: 1,103)

Top