Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morgan@Midwest Diesel & Auto, post: 1129021, member: 8143"] Yes very much so. This 68 need more fuel. Oh, it needs more fuel for sure. The 64 that was in it cleaned it up, the 68 is saying give me more! But of corse the larger turbo is alway better. But over all I was running 37/57 area with the 64 and small turbine. I'm now getting 44/58 with the 68 and large turbine. Yes is spools nearly identical at part throttle. When you go from a roll a just punch it, it's a little slower. But it by far a very good driving turbo. Sixth gear tc locked it tends to kick down a gear before it builds boost more so than the 64. But that's to be expected with a larger turbo. I would have no problem towing with this turbo. And I fully well plan on it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

IMAG0667

eleanor_part_two_48_

BB3C04D5-BB5B-4F75-9207-BBD824089A43_12

BIG_DIRTY_2

My 6.0 Powerstroke

1997 ZF5 DRW

6.4 stock intake on tow power atmosphere turbo

Untitled

76,000 lbs loaded tanker... no problem..

20140828_124157

16349_685490491532570_5454867697180878287_n

Latest posts

A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Today at 12:08 AM
7.3 Aftermarket
Stage 2 LPFS for a 6.0 Powerstroke
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Yesterday at 11:58 PM
Engine and Drivetrain
0
6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: 06Mike
- Yesterday at 2:44 PM
Aftermarket Performance
Florida...
- Latest: Mark Kovalsky
- Wednesday at 10:22 AM
Southeast US
American made up-pipes?
- Latest: Powerstroke Racer
- Wednesday at 9:03 AM
7.3 Aftermarket

Members online

Total: 1,158 (members: 3, guests: 1,155)

Top