Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Charles, post: 99806, member: 103"] Couple easy questions... (Completely pretending flow bench data isn't readily available on the subject...) If the difference between a Hybrid and a B-code is the fact that the B-code has a higher hydraulic ratio (~6:1 vs ~5:1) and you people seem to think a 250 some odd cc B-code is kick ass, plus you think it's because it has "better atomization" due to it's hydraulic ratio, then why do you stop at a B-code? I mean.... if we can EASILY make an A-code that flows well in excess of 250cc, and it's got an even [i]higher[/i] hydraulic ratio than a B.... why do you all praise the B so much? What about the poor A? And in fact.... following this same logic.... what about the reverse hybrid? If 6:1 is better than 5:1, and 7:1 is better than 6:1, then wouldn't 9:1 be better still??? I want to know how you people justify your B-code selection based on the fact that it's a higher hydraulic ratio.... but then don't pick an A for the same reason.... and a reverse hybrid over the A for again, the same reason. All ears. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

Interior

DAY_TWO_2_

1209278_4914170672494_1529267361_n

511-4-2

1108140831a

photo_13_

20121011_204901

IMAG0582

eleanor_part_two_23_

Latest posts

J
Show & Go/Going to Try this Out combo Build
- Latest: Jonnydime
- Today at 9:03 AM
6.4 Aftermarket
Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: ju015dd
- Yesterday at 10:39 PM
6.7 Tech
DEF in the fuel tank of 2013 F250 6.7
- Latest: Crazy Canuck
- Monday at 12:05 PM
6.7 Tech
I
Tuning the 7.3 in current times
- Latest: INFRNL
- Monday at 9:28 AM
7.3 Aftermarket
2000 f350 dually lariat
- Latest: ju015dd
- Monday at 8:19 AM
7.3 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 516 (members: 0, guests: 516)

Top