Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Charles, post: 99916, member: 103"] You say the B has higher quality.... If for the moment we just pretend that the hybrid does [i]not[/i] move more fuel per time across the SAME orifice (meaning the pressure, atomization and quality are [i]higher[/i] for those keeping score...), then pretending that [i]doesn't[/i] happen.... then why if the B is better than the Hybrid, is the A not better than the B for the EXACT SAME reason? And then moving right along.... why then wouldn't the reverse hybrid be better than all of them for the EXACT SAME reason the A was better than the B and the B better than the hybrid??? Lets NOT use flowbench data for a second. Lets just pretend what you're asserting is correct, and the B [i]does[/i] in fact achieve a higher level of atomization because of a greater hydraulic ratio.... so why not run an A code then? It's even BETTER than the B according to that logic... Again....all ears. I really want to know how you people fit these puzzle pieces into your minds in a way that they can actually go together without a hammer. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

silver_truck_drivers_side_front_house

1710

AWOL

CF365ECC-4E81-4D8A-BED8-B526B9B722D6

DE_4_Muffler

2013-03-09_15-42-52_372

Kazakhstan

bryanstruck

Kazakhstan

Latest posts

J
Show & Go/Going to Try this Out combo Build
- Latest: Jonnydime
- Today at 9:03 AM
6.4 Aftermarket
Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: ju015dd
- Yesterday at 10:39 PM
6.7 Tech
DEF in the fuel tank of 2013 F250 6.7
- Latest: Crazy Canuck
- Monday at 12:05 PM
6.7 Tech
I
Tuning the 7.3 in current times
- Latest: INFRNL
- Monday at 9:28 AM
7.3 Aftermarket
2000 f350 dually lariat
- Latest: ju015dd
- Monday at 8:19 AM
7.3 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 575 (members: 0, guests: 575)

Top