Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TARM, post: 1420612, member: 578"] I think the real changes are not some ultimate nozzle or capacity as we have been able to do that for some time. The issue is you can not move the oil fastest enough adn in the volume needed thus b&p ratios etc to put enough fuel in the shorter and shorter windows as rpms drive above the 3k range. Its what helps keep CR systems together with stock bottom ends at much higher HP. TO make the HP at lower RPMS thus less work being done for a given force applied ( tq) it much need more force i.e tq thus more cylinder pressure. If you can fuel into higher RPMS ( more work over time) you can use less force (tq) thus lower CP and get more work down ( horsepower) Thus consider keeping a stock bottom end were properly tuned equated to 1000ftlb tq cylinder pressure. The HP created at 2500RPM at that rate is far less than @ 3500 and so on up to the formula cross over point of 5250 rpm which is the upper limits of most any diesels. It sounds he has found a way to create flow and ratios that allow given oil to do more work in a given period and to flow more oil in and out thru more fuel is injected. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

74219_3996693843931_947432792_n

08 mirror comtrol

13_DP_Mag_Shoot

Smokyred

0101

For Sale: Set of Four 2012 F-250 Lariat Wheels with Used BFGs

.300WM

efi_vs_dd

First truck

Crunch & Run

phone_pics_056

Latest posts

Georgia Roll Call
- Latest: RascalMafia
- Yesterday at 2:52 PM
Southeast US
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Saturday at 8:00 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
Stage 2 LPFS for a 6.0 Powerstroke
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Friday at 11:58 PM
Engine and Drivetrain
0
6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: 06Mike
- Friday at 2:44 PM
Aftermarket Performance
Florida...
- Latest: Mark Kovalsky
- Wednesday at 10:22 AM
Southeast US

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,229 (members: 0, guests: 1,229)

Top