Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="TARM, post: 1421706, member: 578"] Makes sense as they still have to get the fuel in time and that takes pressure but thats sort of my point. Its not that the fuel is atomized better its that more is getting in there. They have messed with this in gassers going from same flow rate but 4 nozzle from 2. THE gains were marginal. But they were there and for a given fuel amount it was cleaner burn. My point was just that its not the atomization itself that the driver of HP as much as its the fuel quantity. I think this is more true with DI than when its precombustion chambers of the older tech. There you need it to more so as its the mixture that has to make it to the cylinder where with DI its there in the cylinder already. But no doubt efficiency goes not when atomization decreases [/QUOTE]

Random media

IMG_4966_1_

2013-02-05_12-21-15_655

Capone

20180720_163114

yhst-131964867535317_2331_301815

Six.4

37639_1380292674996_1462297010_30993191_7998455_n

befor an after

0171

Latest posts

6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Friday at 11:48 PM
Aftermarket Performance
M
oil bypass
- Latest: missfire unload
- Thursday at 9:19 PM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ju015dd
- Wednesday at 8:06 AM
7.3 Aftermarket
Ford 7.3 Passenger Bank Dead
- Latest: 6.0 Tech
- Monday at 8:52 AM
7.3 Tech
Georgia Roll Call
- Latest: RascalMafia
- Sunday at 2:52 PM
Southeast US

Members online

Total: 1,260 (members: 2, guests: 1,258)

Top