Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DaCajun, post: 1418716, member: 15873"] Yes sir, I think it's a nice option to have. Now I don't know just how feasible it would be if one would have to ship their crankshaft out to take care of the machining and the heat treating, you know with these crankshafts being so damn heavy!!! But thankfully I have those services available right here in the DFW area!!! After the rod journals have been turned down to size I'm going to have those nitrated and then the whole rotating assy. properly balanced. Now if I were to be building a max effort engine, well then I'd have no other choice but to go with some $3500 billet rods!!! But thankfully that's not the direction of this build!!! I have a twin turbo (88mm) LS motor that's taking care of that sickness!!! Billet block, billet crank, billet rods and some badass canted valve cylinder heads which flow damn near 500cfm!!! :naughty: This 6.7 is just for my tow vesicle for that other sickness..... [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

2005 "Tweedy"

transmission_pic_2_2_

penny_pincher

Stuck_as_F_K

wopshirt

truck27

5C3T-18C815-CB RADIO

023

F150 and F250

2012-04-24_18-46-02_422

20200503_155046

Latest posts

Ford 7.3 Passenger Bank Dead
- Latest: 6.0 Tech
- Yesterday at 8:52 AM
7.3 Tech
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: Tiha
- Yesterday at 8:22 AM
7.3 Aftermarket
Georgia Roll Call
- Latest: RascalMafia
- Sunday at 2:52 PM
Southeast US
Stage 2 LPFS for a 6.0 Powerstroke
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Friday at 11:58 PM
Engine and Drivetrain
0
6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: 06Mike
- Friday at 2:44 PM
Aftermarket Performance

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,216 (members: 0, guests: 1,216)

Top