Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="mandkole, post: 1081864, member: 4630"] The 436 is an option and better than what you have. However, it was spec'd as a power steering hose at a major truck OEM once upon a time and was upgraded due to heat/impulse related hose/coupling interface issues and cover cracking. The updated 437HT is used today but still sees returns for cracking. IMO, tube delam is primarily a tube extrusion quality issue that can be driven by heat aging. Injectors or hydro-electric valves, it kills them all the same. It was a much bigger issue back in the day with high heat applications and lower quality hose. The high wire pack PTFE hoses supported fears, didnt fail and Aeroquip ran the Navi contract. Keep in mind, fuel attacks rubber much more aggressively (vs oil), I'd think the tube issues would be a more likely with fuel hoses (with similar injector consequences). Has tube delam occurred on an HPOP application? The same OEM above approved our MT3000 hose for a rack/pinion steering program, but it was cancelled early with rack reliability issues. We are working on the intergral gear program now. Im not trying to sell you a hose, but just trying to provide some industry insight and information. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

Bella as puppy

Weight Reduction,one part at a time

20180513_171405_Burst01

DSCF3417

Expansion_SMK200

Headstud impact gun

pistons

1996 F250 460

IMG_20121128_082956

Name_Block_

My 6.0 excursion

Latest posts

I
7.3 LPOP Problem
- Latest: INFRNL
- Yesterday at 4:04 PM
7.3 Tech
Ford 7.3 Passenger Bank Dead
- Latest: 6.0 Tech
- Friday at 7:22 PM
7.3 Tech
J
6.4 spartan
- Latest: jmathews90
- Friday at 6:16 PM
6.4 Performance
Show & Go/Going to Try this Out combo Build
- Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
- Friday at 9:06 AM
6.4 Aftermarket
Y
Fuel sending unit and wheel studs
- Latest: Yojih123
- Friday at 1:00 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,156 (members: 0, guests: 1,156)

Top