Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Connor M, post: 1533951, member: 26837"] The gasser fuel mileage is a full 2-3 mpg less. The resale difference is higher than the initial purchase price, by a good bit. And it increases as the time goes on. The power, especially loaded, is... lacking. I have a stock 14 250 6.7 and a stock 16 6.2, in my fleet and i’d take the 6.7 any day. The 6.2 really feels hills, trailers, and even real heavy loads in the bed. The 6.7 just feels like it likes to run. Out of a 26 gallon tank the 6.7 has a longer range than the 31 gallon tank in the 6.2. Tank I wouldn’t buy a 6.2 again. I like diesels, but regardless even people who are apathetic about them say the 6.2 really isn’t all that. A ******d 6.7 will run circles around a 6.2 in mileage and power. I haven’t heard about the cp4 taking out a 6.7 but regardless the “disaster prevention kits” are cheap insurance. I think the 6.2 is a fine motor, I’m keeping mine and there’s some cool stuff for them, tuning, supercharger kits, etc (it’s the same engine that was in the 6.2 raptors) but imo, there’s not a lot that makes it an attractive option to me over a 6.7. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

befor an after

2013-02-28_14-55-39_771

Step_8-2

IMAG0322

20170502_2125491

DSCN8404

2012-06-26_16-54-42_960

Latest posts

Y
Performance shops
- Latest: Yojih123
- Today at 12:31 AM
7.3 Performance
Indiana
- Latest: glog
- Yesterday at 10:20 AM
6.4 Tech
Will a 1996 F6TZ-9A451-F engine wiring harness work on a 1997 f250 HD ?
- Latest: NotThatGuy
- Yesterday at 12:45 AM
94-97 Aftermarket
I
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: INFRNL
- Sunday at 4:05 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
N
Do not recommend Choate Engineering
- Latest: Novapower62
- Sunday at 10:56 AM
Newly Enlisted

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 512 (members: 0, guests: 512)

Top