Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="superpsd, post: 1399525, member: 15821"] I think if 200% nozzles were so poor at atomization they would not run well on stock calibration. My tune for 200% nozzles has idle mapping areas that are unchanged from a stock program. If you toggle from my tune to a stock AA calibration it's seemlesss and idles purfect. The other side of it is pressure drop behind the Intensifier piston. An A code 6.0mm plunger has to stroke further to inject the same amount of fuel than a 7.1mm B code or Hydrid plunger will have to stroke. One reason why the large A codes are so oil hungry and you don't see any talk about huge A codes with 200% nozzles much. I have my daily tune for 200% nozzles set to 1.8ms and max of 3000 ICP. Drives and idles very nice. Only issue I have is the touchy pedal due to ICP rate. I may play with it more to tackle a happy medium as I finish all the other upgrades. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

1997 ZF5 DRW

IMAG0795_1_

IMAG0071

935345_10151587373928866_2074320702_n

RImsss

0920111854_1_

jeep_trunk_sub

4" above stock

IMG_20141025_125543719

20151116_172104

first_f350

Latest posts

Y
Fuel sending unit and wheel studs
- Latest: Yojih123
- Today at 1:00 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
Show & Go/Going to Try this Out combo Build
- Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
- Yesterday at 7:47 PM
6.4 Aftermarket
Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: ju015dd
- Wednesday at 10:39 PM
6.7 Tech
DEF in the fuel tank of 2013 F250 6.7
- Latest: Crazy Canuck
- Monday at 12:05 PM
6.7 Tech
I
Tuning the 7.3 in current times
- Latest: INFRNL
- Monday at 9:28 AM
7.3 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,179 (members: 0, guests: 1,179)

Top