Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Power Hungry, post: 311059, member: 1375"] Honestly, I'm rather curious as to the reason for this myself. I'd have expected to see some loss of boost to coincide with the change in EBP, but really didn't see it. I know there's a big consideration in regards to the spooling characteristics and how that carried into the power curve, but once spooled it really shouldn't make all that much difference. Keep in mind that I am using a mechanical boost gauge to measure the boost and it's only as accurate as my videos of the gauges and what I see when I'm running the truck. I *could* be a pound off here or there but still think the data we've seen is still quite accurate. The overall thing is the dyno plots and they unequivocally show that the configuration we ran suffered a significant performance loss. I'm still cruising through the datalogs and processing the information to see if there is anything else that may explain the difference in power output, but as of yet I have no reasonable explanation. All I can say is that when we put the 38R back together, the power curve returned. If anyone has any interesting theories, I'd love to discuss them. Take care. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

Screen_Shot_2014-06-04_at_8_45_50_PM

39092_1458258390678_1659931355_1101772_820668_n

IMG_20140915_092136

DE_4_Side

photo_210

20110524164817

White truck

34708F38-232B-490B-9157-249C6BAC2317

Latest posts

Ford 7.3 Passenger Bank Dead
- Latest: 6.0 Tech
- Yesterday at 7:22 PM
7.3 Tech
J
6.4 spartan
- Latest: jmathews90
- Yesterday at 6:16 PM
6.4 Performance
Show & Go/Going to Try this Out combo Build
- Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
- Yesterday at 9:06 AM
6.4 Aftermarket
Y
Fuel sending unit and wheel studs
- Latest: Yojih123
- Yesterday at 1:00 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: ju015dd
- Wednesday at 10:39 PM
6.7 Tech

Members online

Arisley

Total: 525 (members: 1, guests: 524)

Top