Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Power Hungry, post: 314853, member: 1375"] Our elevation is about 800 Ft. I didn't notice any difference in lag/spool between the housings while running loaded on the dyno. Truck feels very responsive with both housings and the dyno didn't show a significant loss with the 1.15 housing, so I'd say you could go either way. My biggest thing between the housing was that the cost factor seemed to outweigh any perceived EGT/Backpressure benefits of the looser housing. The 1.0 housing runs fine at this point with no surging as of yet. Now, I have not put a trailer on the back or anything like that so I can't say 100% that there isn't any surge with the 1.0 housing, but I'll wait until we get the new tranny installed before I proceed any further since the tranny and converter is going change the loading on the engine. We'll fine tune after that and if it is deemed necessary we'll change back to the 1.15 housing. At this point, I don't see the need to. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

crowfoot_wrench_4

Crandall

97 F350 4x4

317365_166563960102974_100002481131528_318921_78460406_n

20121013_175916

dd_maximizer_hardware

2001_Durango

Hydroboost and power steering

Latest posts

0
6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: 06Mike
- 13 minutes ago
Aftermarket Performance
M
oil bypass
- Latest: missfire unload
- Yesterday at 9:19 PM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ju015dd
- Yesterday at 8:06 AM
7.3 Aftermarket
Ford 7.3 Passenger Bank Dead
- Latest: 6.0 Tech
- Monday at 8:52 AM
7.3 Tech
Georgia Roll Call
- Latest: RascalMafia
- Sunday at 2:52 PM
Southeast US

Members online

Total: 1,032 (members: 2, guests: 1,030)

Top