Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jdc753, post: 606901, member: 52"] Then that would be a totally different discussion, 1 part at a time, find out what the restriction in the system is, and then work on improving it. But flow testing both the heads and the intake at the same time would be a waste of time, or at least wouldn't narrow down results or improvements, just show a bulk change. If the stock intake flows say 500CFM and the heads flow 800CFM, then a ported intake that flows 1000CFM would be an improvement on the system, but if you test both as a system then you will only either see 500CFM flow, or 800CFM flow and have no clue which one needs improvements. Systematic testing of each individual component is the only way to determine the bottleneck in the system. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

IMG_20130409_180326_140

Trucksetup

FB_IMG_15249195915951

2013-03-26_19-02-37_591

E1B2067A-B886-48E6-8696-6D218CC01E4D

2011-02-26_16-42-21_15

he351ve

22CFE362-8FC2-4A49-B36A-F2F44645DDFE

Dyno at Redline Diesel

Latest posts

A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Yesterday at 8:00 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
Stage 2 LPFS for a 6.0 Powerstroke
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Friday at 11:58 PM
Engine and Drivetrain
0
6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: 06Mike
- Friday at 2:44 PM
Aftermarket Performance
Florida...
- Latest: Mark Kovalsky
- Wednesday at 10:22 AM
Southeast US
American made up-pipes?
- Latest: Powerstroke Racer
- Wednesday at 9:03 AM
7.3 Aftermarket

Members online

LivinAnAdvntr

Total: 1,247 (members: 1, guests: 1,246)

Top