Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="sootie, post: 1503841, member: 8162"] you went from old age reliability with the 7.3, to the new age reliability of a 6.7. Going back to 6.4 is a step in the wrong direction. Remember that Navistar rushed the engine into production to meet the emission requirements. Long term, this proved detrimental to the longevity of the engine. Not only that, there are some inherent design flaws that are impossible to detect or avoid. High pressure fuel pump, cracked pistons and lifters are the first that come to mind. That doesnt even include worn/broken rocker arms, cracked egr coolers etc. I know people will say just remove the emissions components and you will be fine but i have proved otherwise. They are gutless fuel whores in stock form and a ticking time bomb in tuned form. When a six four goes down, it is never a cheap fix. Over 30% of engine related failures in most six fours end up being catastrophic or require major engine work. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

triples2

clutch4

2013-02-12_14-58-10_487

1511MG-101

62B7D3B2-6795-4B0D-8459-06EEA8583FBE

IMG_20111106_165959

20160405_193649

20140114_135303

exit_2_5

Latest posts

Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: Sterling6.7
- Yesterday at 8:29 PM
6.7 Tech
Do not recommend Choate Engineering
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Wednesday at 10:22 PM
Newly Enlisted
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Wednesday at 9:41 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
O
2011-2016 Radiator upgrade
- Latest: OtisCreekConstruction
- Wednesday at 6:17 PM
6.7 Tech
Performance shops
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Tuesday at 8:42 AM
7.3 Performance

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 413 (members: 0, guests: 413)

Top