Pitcher
New member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12
- Reaction score
- 0
Or is everyone hiding from the uneducated bashers?
I may be wrong on that article. It was years ago but I'm 90% sure that's what the article said ole boy was running in his excursion. That's just one guy though.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N910A using Tapatalk
Yeah, it can/has been done.
Just stating the fact that mechanical engines are better with it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
I 100% disagree with that. The 7.3 and the 6.0 are probably the most ideal candidates for WVO use, because the fuel flows directly through the head. It can pre-heat fuel better than most other diesels out there.
Mechanical engines are simpler, for sure, and easier to repair in most cases, and more forgiving. But if done correctly, at least with WVO, I prefer 7.3's and 6.0's. The key is doing it correctly. Starting and shutting down on #2, and only burning WVO when it's heated.
I 100% disagree with that. The 7.3 and the 6.0 are probably the most ideal candidates for WVO use, because the fuel flows directly through the head. It can pre-heat fuel better than most other diesels out there.
The 6.4L Powerstroke with the stock fuel cooler / heater was slick. It kept the WMO above 80 degrees prior to hitting the CP3.
Made things quit nice for viscosity. The only downfall was the pathetic stock lift pump, which was easily replaced.
CP3 on a 6.4?
That is exactly what I've done in my 12v. Mixed up to 15% WMO in with #2 and ran it that way all the time.Have you tried running small amounts through the tank, continually? Say 10%, mixed in the tank? As opposed to starting and stopping on #2, and running the wmo in between?