Here is a bit more through explanation of the previous post I made. I think it may be helpful in assisting people in how to pick or rate various oils and what specs are important.
Once the oil warms up there is very little difference in the SAE viscosity of a 15w40 and 5w40 IF the HTHS numbers are the same or close. This is the spec rating, HTHS, people should actually be looking at for protectiveness and what we think of as thickness of the oil. If you are going solely by the standard -w-- (5w40) SAE rating then technically once at operating temp there is no difference between a 5w40 15w40 or anything *w40 for that matter as they all have the same SAE hot temp viscosity rating. So much has been convoluted for the purposes of marketing and making profits you have to dig deeper. Different oil vis for different environmental temps has to do with the cold range vis not the hot temp vis. Now there certianly can be differences in oil additives such as ones that prevent foaming as well as the quailty of the base oils going from one oil manf or line of oils and another. This is why you need to get the actual spec ratings of the oil you are using, including specifically the HTHS level. There is a dif between the min spec to get various API ratings and what is the recommended specs of various components such as those put forth by the the actual diesel manufactures or the DEM association.
HTHS stands for, High Temp High Shear. It is a test method to measure oil vis under "High Temp High Shear" conditions that would be useful in a engine such as valve train or bearing areas or in our case add to that the HPOP and its Injectors. But there is a big push for fuel efficiency ratings and the lower the HTHS in general the better the mpg but the lower longevity of and rate of wear protections. A reason diesel oils in general are the highest rated oils compared to those specific to gasoline only. As long as a oil gets you past a vehicle manf warranty period what do they really care about more longevity compared to meeting a better mpg rating with all the international pressure on conventional fuel use. MPG is gonna win every time in major lines.
Good synthetics tend to hold their HTHS and TBN levels better than dinos so a slightly lower number might be equal (you see this with budget quasi syn) but personally I want to see the higher HTHS numbers.
Rotella since it switched to its T6 formula has changed its policy and refuses to give out its HTHS rating. This makes it suspect IMO. There is also talk of different formulas being made in Canada versus USA for the same labeled oil. Rotella's Dino 15w40 if unchanged had a rating of 3.9 HTHS according to Rot literature. My guess is T6 is similar but may not be.
IMO, for good quailty diesel you should be looking for numbers not below 4.0
If I had to pick a pure Dino oil that you can get easily off the shelf at stores: Mobile Delvac with a HTHS of 4.3 would be it. It also scores very high in other categories.
In general oils have moved to lower HTHS numbers to rate better in fuel efficiency. So new formulas tend to have lower ratings as their is a direct correlations between the two. So lower protection better mpg versus better protection and holding in grade during hard use. In fact numerous protective contents and specs have all been lowered in the name of trivial mpg gains and now to protect the extremely expensive emissions equipment being added to our diesels which already had less over all pollutants compared to gasoline in output per mile.
With a HUEI motor it will clearly tell you when you have gone to long with OCI if you are observant of how your engine runs. By 6K with Rot its would be trying hard to get your attention.
Just think about what happens to the oil in a HUEI the harder you drive one. Think about what it goes thru compared to other diesels that are non HUEI. Not to mention how much you are decreasing the life of your injectors by running oil for longer OCI.
I personally run Schaeffer's 9000 5w40 with a HTHS:4.5 TBN:10.6 100c temp Viscosity:15.75 NOACK:11