Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
New showcase items
New showcase comments
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Showcase
New items
New comments
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest updates
Search showcase
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Peak Torque High vs Low RPM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="TARM, post: 319622, member: 578"] This is where I was eventually wanting to go with this and what actually got me started down the path of considering these things. Then looking at some CP curves that had been on the net etc .. Something Charles once posted a while back I had dug up which also gave me serious thought on it. I recall him posting on fuel furn and smoke. When he got things really clean and crisp he felt that there was likley a serious sharp CP spike and fast curve which had to do with the way the fuel was injected. This lead me down the path that the same TQ average TQ can be made from very different CP curves. That got me wanting to consider the low versus high RPM tq and the whys of it all. Down low when things are moving slower you want a CP peak that more evenly matches the speed of the engine. As rpms climb things need /can be made to happen faster. I think CP testing equip now that its coming way down in price it can really aid in getting our tuning much more refined. During munitions and fire arms load development it could take literally hundreds of rounds to finally get the ideal load for a particular length barrel, bullet, powder combo. Once I purchased Cylinder pressure system combined with dual chronographs and load software we were able to bring this down to 3-5 rounds to get a particular combine to its ideal combo that also had the broadest what we call sweet spot. I think the same can be said of engine tune development. To do this right and in the most efficient manner you really should have Tuning software of course, Load dyno, and Cylinder Pressure System ( at a min 1 cylinder ideal all 8). IMO of the two I think CP testing equip over a dyno to be the most critical to tuning [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Random media
Latest posts
A few turbo questions and a rant
Latest: ghohouston
Yesterday at 11:41 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
Florida...
Latest: Mark Kovalsky
Yesterday at 10:22 AM
Southeast US
American made up-pipes?
Latest: Powerstroke Racer
Yesterday at 9:03 AM
7.3 Aftermarket
Georgia Roll Call
Latest: ju015dd
Tuesday at 7:03 AM
Southeast US
Ford 7.3 Passenger Bank Dead
Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
Monday at 8:20 PM
7.3 Tech
Members online
LivinAnAdvntr
Blitzin247
Mknp84
Forums
Power Strokes
7.3 Aftermarket
Peak Torque High vs Low RPM
Top