Soot Powered Ported Intake?

Status
Not open for further replies.

08BIGRIG

New member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
1,814
Reaction score
0
Location
WI
Anyone have any experiance with these ported intakes for the 6.4? I was talking with Pat from KEM and he turned me on to these. Just wondering if anyone has one or if they know anyone else with one and what they think about them.
 

Matt

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
1,897
Reaction score
0
Location
Minnesota
I thought thats why they call it port AND polish? I kid, I kid.
 

patrickke

New member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
0
Location
Lexington,ky
Yes, but typically people think that high flow capabilities means the best option. But when people hog out parts you indirectly can hinder velocity.
 

bigrpowr

<How I Fly
Administrator
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
15,240
Reaction score
1
Yes, but typically people think that high flow capabilities means the best option. But when people hog out parts you indirectly can hinder velocity.

Huh? When a head is ported its flowed. If the work is more efficient , the head will flow more , period. Surface condition and volume are the culprits of head work. How many sets of heads have you had flowed before and after? The same how for a manifold. The proof is in the flow bench and the data that follows.
 

jkidd_39

Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
547
Reaction score
0
Location
NW Arkansas
I think he is referring to poor porting work, Mike.

I know of quite a few people that had head work done and got nothing back in terms of flow data. I thought this was incredible stupid.. but wasn't my money or heads.. same ol' story.. it was a guy thats been porting for 40 years.. blah blah blah..
 

bigrpowr

<How I Fly
Administrator
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
15,240
Reaction score
1
I think he is referring to poor porting work, Mike.

I know of quite a few people that had head work done and got nothing back in terms of flow data. I thought this was incredible stupid.. but wasn't my money or heads.. same ol' story.. it was a guy thats been porting for 40 years.. blah blah blah..

Im not trying to hammer anybody, but hearing "you should SEE his head work" just made no sense.
 

jkidd_39

Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
547
Reaction score
0
Location
NW Arkansas
agreed.. before and after flow sheets are sexier.. haha..

While we are on the subject.. when you get flow results do you get them on every cylinder? I've only seen where they flow one
 

bigrpowr

<How I Fly
Administrator
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
15,240
Reaction score
1
I've never had a sheet that showed each cylinder. But usually the tooling is repeatable so it's not an issue. The polishing is so small of a factor I don't think it could cause much of a variance. I've had 3 sets of 7.3 heads done and 1 set of 6.4 heads. The 6.4 heads had the most to gain and were by far the most noticeable in spool up and temp. , hard to say on the power increase though.
 

Powerstroked162

On Da Juice
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
10,069
Reaction score
0
Location
Wa. State
There are different methods and views on flow...Are you meaning a cutaway?

Yup. Its usually classified as "The right way and the wrong way".....


Just post some pics of the 6.4 and 6.0 manifolds, please. Exterior, interior, both, I don't care.
 

patrickke

New member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
0
Location
Lexington,ky
I will speak with Matt about it...but exterior wise you can only look so much different, also there are different things you can do to make them have a higher velocity
 

Beans71086

New member
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
2,898
Reaction score
0
Location
North East, MD / Clearville, PA
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.
Top