Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="2000wa250, post: 1341190, member: 3399"] I think what Charles is getting at is right now you're using addition where as if you reverse it you'd be using multiplication. The blower moves air, where as the turbo compresses is. When you compress air then send it through a unit which just moves x amount of air, you are feeding x cfm of y compressed air. When you feed the turbo with the blower your end result is simply y compressed air of x cfm. You're ONLY using the blower for down low. When placed after the turbo you're forcing more mass of compressed air into the motor and it's benefitting you 24/7. Either way works, Charles way just would make making BIG power extremely easy and simple because the total mass of air being forced into the motor would be in essence compressed twice. Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

Superduty

1209278_4914170672494_1529267361_n

rod1

cleaning_axles_1_

0615112051

IMAG0349

1013929_4487306641160_1959472154_n

193474_196574997029461_100000308874737_610002_1926299_o1

20171108_152953

HFCM MANIFOLD FLUSH

Latest posts

D
‘10 6.4 rebuild
- Latest: Dieselnewb64
- Yesterday at 9:53 PM
6.4 Tech & FAQ
MISC NEW PERFORMANCE PARTS
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Yesterday at 12:47 AM
Aftermarket Performance
Stage 2 LPFS for a 6.0 Powerstroke
- Latest: powerlifter405
- Yesterday at 12:45 AM
Engine and Drivetrain
* Vanilla Ice * 2005 f250 Lariat 4x4 Crew For Sale
- Latest: ju015dd
- Monday at 3:36 PM
Trucks
2000 f350 dually lariat
- Latest: ju015dd
- Monday at 3:04 PM
7.3 Aftermarket

Members online

Total: 1,403 (members: 2, guests: 1,401)

Top