Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="FaSSt9602, post: 390847, member: 1872"] What you are asking is for the SC to do the work under 2k rpms, get bypassed above that, then a turbocharger to take over between 2k-3k rpms, bypassed above that, then a second turbocharger to take over above that??? Kind of hard to read between what you are saying, but if I am right, I think you are not understanding the concept of compounding with either two (or 3) turbo chargers, or a SC and a turbo. You are way over thinking this! :thumbup: You don't need to physically bypass any component just because one does better at X rpm than the other. That is the beauty of compounding! Like Matt said, run a Procharger with a good sized turbocharger like a 70. The Procharger is in essence your low pressure unit that feeds into the 70 which will basically be one hell of a big high pressure unit! No need to bypass anything. If you absolutely need to have a SC and two turbos for the cool factor, run two identical smaller turbochargers as the high pressure unit fed by whatever SC you decide to run. If you haven't looked under the hood, space is a premium and finding room for all that would be pretty impressive which is why I say you would be more than happy with the procharger kit... [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

jeep_front

The Truck

2011-11-20_12-57-26_962

2.6 truck

IMAG1039

stroke

The Truck

1997 ZF5 DRW

Latest posts

0
6.7 pump with DD fuel bowl delete for 6.0. All lines and fittings with Rudy's drawstraw
- Latest: 06Mike
- Today at 2:44 PM
Aftermarket Performance
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Yesterday at 6:06 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
Florida...
- Latest: Mark Kovalsky
- Wednesday at 10:22 AM
Southeast US
American made up-pipes?
- Latest: Powerstroke Racer
- Wednesday at 9:03 AM
7.3 Aftermarket
Georgia Roll Call
- Latest: ju015dd
- Tuesday at 7:03 AM
Southeast US

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,170 (members: 0, guests: 1,170)

Top