Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kowboy, post: 1561731, member: 29363"] Peroni, I think that you will be surprised at how well it performs. When I was trying to decide on what turbo would fit my driving style, along with our elevation. I contacted a number of vendors and the 364.5/80 was reamended the most, followed by the 366. I did not feel good about either of these two turbos. I had also contacted James Barder. He suggested the 363/68/.91, I asked him why the small turbine, his response was that the smaller turbine would spool better, and that the larger turbine was kind of a mismatch for the 363. His exact quote "The 68 will be more responsive for what your looking to do. Will limit top end a little but give you better low end. The 63/73 is a bit of a mismatch." I never felt that it stopped pulling in the upper RPM's, but I don't spend much time there. Please let us know your thoughts when it is back up and running with the 363. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

White KRanch

JoesIPR

549994_3903693771203_1518534086_n-2

White_monster intake

5E1D625B-2EAF-4EC9-BA67-09C7F10230DE

eleanor_part_two_1_

No_Limit_CAI_2

481285_3466597804077_1390809946_n

SAM_0889

Latest posts

GT37 Turbocharger w/10 blade turbine, billet comp.
- Latest: hskfab
- Friday at 1:24 PM
Engine and Drivetrain
Hard steer question/issue
- Latest: psduser1
- Thursday at 8:52 PM
7.3 Tech
B
WTS/WIF light flash and stall issue
- Latest: blickcd
- Thursday at 6:23 AM
6.0 Tech
T
2013+ steering gearbox in older trucks
- Latest: TPOLO
- Wednesday at 11:09 AM
Suspension, Drive Train, and Tires
J
15 cab on 08
- Latest: jeretl
- Jun 2, 2025
Aftermarket Super Duty 1999 - Current

Members online

Total: 1,003 (members: 3, guests: 1,000)

Top