Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hotrodtractor, post: 987495, member: 25"] That is actually a pretty good analogy for both systems. Kudos. Common rail injection systems have identical PW limitations, but since the fuel rate is higher, it rarely ever gets talked about. There are those of us that would like the 7.3 segment of the industry to drift towards higher flowing injectors, but it doesn't happen for lots of reasons, mostly because they require more effort to dial in correctly and show more flaws in the user's system (oil, fuel, sensors, etc...). FWIW - I'm making roughly 640rwhp on 37s Using 1.9ms of PW on a common rail injection system. I know of a HEUI motor on 33s??? that made 530ish rwhp using 1.5ms, but most would be closer to double the PW (2.5-3.0) for that same power level. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

2011-12-21_13-24-05_760

IMG_20130406_180211_348

Custom Ricky's Dash Mounts/H&S/Edge/Dashdaq

At least a stroke is pullin the stroke

NL60PHP

2008 FX4

20140319_152824

My 2011 F250 Lariat

eleanor_part_two_68_

eleanor_part_two_70_

Ranger

Latest posts

Y
Fuel sending unit and wheel studs
- Latest: Yojih123
- Today at 1:00 AM
7.3 Tech & FAQ
Show & Go/Going to Try this Out combo Build
- Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
- Yesterday at 7:47 PM
6.4 Aftermarket
Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: ju015dd
- Wednesday at 10:39 PM
6.7 Tech
DEF in the fuel tank of 2013 F250 6.7
- Latest: Crazy Canuck
- Monday at 12:05 PM
6.7 Tech
I
Tuning the 7.3 in current times
- Latest: INFRNL
- Monday at 9:28 AM
7.3 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 596 (members: 0, guests: 596)

Top