6.4 Rebuild - Valvetrain Movement ('Lift') - Very Little

MS1

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2017
Messages
15
Reaction score
1
Location
Chicago
RE: 2008 F-250 6.4 (215k, Job 1)

I'm in the midst of rebuilding - or more so 'Replacing', the top end of my 2008 6.4. I have installed the new valvetrain components on new KDD Cylinder Heads (Stage 2, 100 lb Valve Springs). Everything torqued to spec (did rockers first) but when I hand crank the engine the pushrods only 'snug-up' to the rocker arms. The rocker arms themselves do not discernably move or compress the valve springs. The top of the rockers are essentially flush across the head. I HAVE checked the cam through the block and the lobes look good, at least to my to my relatively untrained eye.

  • Did I miss a step?
  • Do I need to Compress the valve springs for the install?
  • IS this normal (???)

Common sense would tell me that the replacement pushrods are too short, but that seems to be the route even Ford has gone with the 6.4 pushrods.

Here are the components I'm using (All are New Parts):
  • KDD Heads w/Stage 2, 100lb Valve Springs[/URL]
  • Elgin Industries Hydraulic Roller Lifters (HL-2201S)
  • RCD Chromoly Pushrods, .080 Wall (Replacing the 3/8" longer OEM w/balls on the ends)
  • OEM Rocker Arms and Valve Bridges

Any insight or thoughts would be greatly appreciated as this is my work truck - and only vehicle, so I've really gotta get this Sucker back on the road, but I can't continue until I get this figured out. Thank You!



*Genesis for Rebuild - I had what I thought to be a stuck injector, turned out to be a broken rocker arm. Decided to put the time/money into it, as the truck has been fantastic for 50k+ miles even with somewhat regular heavy towing use and is already otherwise 'set-up' for my work.
 

Attachments

  • IMG E0819 - VALVETRAIN.jpg
    IMG E0819 - VALVETRAIN.jpg
    231.8 KB · Views: 93
  • IMG E0821 - VALVETRAIN.jpg
    IMG E0821 - VALVETRAIN.jpg
    249.5 KB · Views: 91
  • IMG 0824 - PUSHROD LENGTH COMPARISON.jpg
    IMG 0824 - PUSHROD LENGTH COMPARISON.jpg
    397.9 KB · Views: 105
  • IMG 0825 - PUSHROD LENGTH COMPARISON - DETAIL.jpg
    IMG 0825 - PUSHROD LENGTH COMPARISON - DETAIL.jpg
    268.5 KB · Views: 104

sootie

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Messages
11,849
Reaction score
36
What is there to figure out? The lifters are hydraulic. You won't see proper operation unless the engine has full oil pressure
 

Bgdiesel

New member
Joined
Mar 28, 2012
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Location
Middleburg, FL
I have to disagree with both you guys, the rockers will actuate and the valves will open without oil in the lifters, not fully but will obviously cycle up and down... if you read what he said, he said no movement whatsoever and you guys have got to know that there is no need for a drastically shorter pushrod like that on a 6.4 engine and the updates shorter pushrod from ford is only shorter compared to what came on the 6.0, not the 6.4 engine, it is what always came in 6.4'a because the cam is .050" higher in the block compared to the 6.0 block design... in summary you have way to short of a pushrod


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Sixfoh

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2019
Messages
94
Reaction score
1
Yup just did a 6.4 rebuild and torqued to the book specs. Requiring only half be torqued then the motor turned 180 degrees and the others torqued etc. All of my components snugged up and were not loose as you describe. Also used KDD heads. Also might be worth while I soaked my lifters for about a day. Although they werent completely "full" I find it good practice to soak some of these valve train parts. And satisfying to watch them bleed out air bubbles LOL
 

Attachments

  • 20200426_155244.jpg
    20200426_155244.jpg
    1,004.3 KB · Views: 82
  • 20200426_191728.jpg
    20200426_191728.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 76
Last edited:

webb06

Active member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
3,892
Reaction score
12
Location
Seneca, MO
I have to disagree with both you guys, the rockers will actuate and the valves will open without oil in the lifters, not fully but will obviously cycle up and down... if you read what he said, he said no movement whatsoever and you guys have got to know that there is no need for a drastically shorter pushrod like that on a 6.4 engine and the updates shorter pushrod from ford is only shorter compared to what came on the 6.0, not the 6.4 engine, it is what always came in 6.4'a because the cam is .050" higher in the block compared to the 6.0 block design... in summary you have way to short of a pushrod


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



I’ve pulled apart many early build 6.4 engines that have the same length pushrod as 6.0.

Still think the lifters need oil to bring up the slack. Why would RCD mass produce a pushrod that is too short? Those guys know what they’re doing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

StrokiNDieseL

New member
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
539
Reaction score
0
Location
Geneva, Fl.
I’ve pulled apart many early build 6.4 engines that have the same length pushrod as 6.0.

Still think the lifters need oil to bring up the slack. Why would RCD mass produce a pushrod that is too short? Those guys know what they’re doing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just followed these guys recommendations of just in/out & torque to specs using rcd replacement and all went snug. Just rockers/pushrod replacement here tho for now.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Top