Dyno #'s drag time on Matt's race tune

Strokin6.4 · May 23, 2012

Do you have anyone eldest race tune that you could compare to?

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

MINK · May 23, 2012

pog said:
The slip on the bottom left shows 12.929@ only 88mph, isn't the speed low or am I missing something?

The trap speed is way low, some goofy readings going on at the track that day.

MINK · May 23, 2012

Strokin6.4 said:
Do you have anyone eldest race tune that you could compare to?

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

Look in his sig, Kem ran 13.2 on his truck

Matts race tune is very on par with others, 12.7-13.2 are verry common times between all the race tunes for a "stock" truck. IMO Matts tune runs cooler and smoother than the other tunes ive played with - did I mention no smoke

Dustball8504 · May 23, 2012

So you are the one who the dyno operator told me made 500 on the H&S lol. I guess you didn't tell him you were actually running an SCT.

He also said I should get rid of my SCT with Erics tune for the H&S because it's the only one that proved to do any power for a tuner only 6.4 on his super accurate dyno.

Rmartin-97 · May 23, 2012

Strokin6.4 said:
Do you have anyone eldest race tune that you could compare to?

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

Yea Kem is my only other tune I've ran.

MINK · May 23, 2012

Dustball8504 said:
So you are the one who the dyno operator told me made 500 on the H&S lol. I guess you didn't tell him you were actually running an SCT.

He also said I should get rid of my SCT with Erics tune for the H&S because it's the only one that proved to do any power for a tuner only 6.4 on his super accurate dyno.

The joys of a dyno - honestly yours should of been higher. The track tells the story regardless.

Dustball8504 · May 23, 2012

MINK said:
The joys of a dyno - honestly yours should of been higher. The track tells the story regardless.

Oh I know, it's a joke for my sig now haha. My truck has already been 13.3 @101 on Gearheads Hot Street tune and the XRace is stronger. I also dynoed a little over 500 at Fall Brawl.

Strokin6.4 · May 23, 2012

Yeah I was just wondering cuz I've ran a race tune from another company and was faster and 7870lbs with a 1.8 60'. Not starting a **** fest between tuners though cuz I hate stupid arguements when you need raw numbers from the same truck. Crazy gearhead is that much faster than KEM though!

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

Rmartin-97 · May 23, 2012

Strokin6.4 said:
Yeah I was just wondering cuz I've ran a race tune from another company and was faster and 7870lbs with a 1.8 60'. Not starting a **** fest between tuners though cuz I hate stupid arguements when you need raw numbers from the same truck. Crazy gearhead is that much faster than KEM though!

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

Gearhead has a lot more power throughout the rpms than Kem don't get me wrong the 345 is a great tune just not as fast as gearhead.

MINK · May 23, 2012

Strokin6.4 said:
Yeah I was just wondering cuz I've ran a race tune from another company and was faster and 7870lbs with a 1.8 60'. Not starting a **** fest between tuners though cuz I hate stupid arguements when you need raw numbers from the same truck. Crazy gearhead is that much faster than KEM though!

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

Again hard to compare as his times are different tracks, conditions etc. Also you saying your "other" tune was faster is pointless as you are throwing a entire different truck into the equation.

Another member did a very good test with IDP and gearhead a month or so back, same track, truck, conditions - gearhead turned out to be faster. Granted anyone who has done a few passes knows it is a challenge in its self to run consistently as a driver, also your trucks temps can change along with the track. So many variables, If people proved a certain tune to ALWAYS average say a .5 of a second faster then the others then I might bite on someone regarding a "fastest" tune.