I would have guessed it to be around the 470 mark.
Apr 30, 2013 #41 WHY NOT New member Joined Jun 21, 2011 Messages 3,912 Reaction score 0 Location Carlyle IL I would have guessed it to be around the 470 mark.
Apr 30, 2013 #42 bruce65trojan New member Joined Apr 14, 2013 Messages 141 Reaction score 0 I did too. Now I'm really wondering if everything was loaded up right!
Apr 30, 2013 #43 Rowdy New member Joined Nov 25, 2012 Messages 206 Reaction score 0 Location Fort Worth,Tx Something is defiantly not right! You should be 70-100hp more than that. H&S quotes 497Hp as an average.
Something is defiantly not right! You should be 70-100hp more than that. H&S quotes 497Hp as an average.
Apr 30, 2013 #44 Rowdy New member Joined Nov 25, 2012 Messages 206 Reaction score 0 Location Fort Worth,Tx Do you know what the cummins put down? Was it lower than he expected?
Apr 30, 2013 #45 bruce65trojan New member Joined Apr 14, 2013 Messages 141 Reaction score 0 I didn't hang around for the cummins. I was frustrated with the numbers. The ft/lbs was some where in the ball park of 1000 which I was expecting but the Hp just wasn't what I wanted and I'm curious as of why.
I didn't hang around for the cummins. I was frustrated with the numbers. The ft/lbs was some where in the ball park of 1000 which I was expecting but the Hp just wasn't what I wanted and I'm curious as of why.
Apr 30, 2013 #46 WILD_PHIL New member Joined May 30, 2012 Messages 2,392 Reaction score 0 Location East TX I would like to dyno on HD300 fuel set at 1 and 5 and dyno on suggested fuel mileage tunes.