I for one would love some feedback on the 1.15 housing (van turbo).
Unfortunately, we do not have any plans to test the 1.15ar housing. We just don't see much of a point since the .84ar and 1.0ar do so well.
I for one would love some feedback on the 1.15 housing (van turbo).
Interesting, I have a 1.0 and thinking I would like to experiment with an .84 housing. With 3.55s AND a zf5. It's all about maintaining and low rpm spool for my situation.
I will be following this.
If you change to the .84 I’m willing to bet you won’t go back to the 1.0 for your application.
Side note- Are the SD turbines back in stock?
My EGTs are pretty low with the Van turbo and sxe turbine. Running a canned tune SCT, on the 110hp tune I really have to push it to break 1250*. The hottest I have been able to get it is 1300* on an unloaded run 15-75mph up an 11% grade. Max boost on that tune is 27psi. Have been running a 45hp tow tune and it is difficult to even reach 1000* with normal driving. A decent acceleration @ 16-18 psi boost will barely touch 1000*. It gets up to around 1200* towing up longer grades but peaks there, boost is 24psi. I like the sxe/van combo better than the sxe/stock(.84) turbo I am running on another truck. The .84 does spool faster and is better suited on a stock tune. Ran the sxe/van on a stock tune for a while and it was pretty laggy. Running a 9+0 billet compressor on both turbos.
Unfortunately, we do not have any plans to test the 1.15ar housing. We just don't see much of a point since the .84ar and 1.0ar do so well.
See i love 1.15 housings. I think i might just copy cat your setup for my obs. It is already swapped over to 3" plenums, sd up pipes, and a stock sd turbo. I hate the .84 housing, way too restrictive imo. Especially with stock size tires/rims, 4:10's and zf5. The correct genuine Garrett 1.15 housing can be had for under $200 brand new, plus the cost of the turbine shaft, and comp wheel, sounds like it will make a budget friendly awesome turbo.
For me I prefer the larger turbine wheel of the 1.15/van, especially in SXE form. 2mm larger than many successful S300/68 turbos and in between the 68mm and 73mm version of the S300. Have tossed around the idea of lathing a .84 housing fit. Personally running both .84/68mm and 1.15/70mm turbos with your guys SXE and matching compressors the 1.15 pulls smoother @ towing rpms (2200-2500) Although, I would like to try out a .84/70mm with a 63mm compressor wheel.
Did you ever do a comparison between that and a 38r?My all time favorite so far is 63/73/.84... I think that is going to be our most popular turbo
Did you ever do a comparison between that and a 38r?
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Did you ever do a comparison between that and a 38r?
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Curious what you don't like about the .84ar... what exactly does it do that you don't like.
On the dyno when we tested the .84ar and 1.0ar back to back... the 1.0ar made 2-3psi less boost, 3-5psi less ebp, 10hp less, 50egts less and spooled noticeably slower.
For me... I would take the better power, quicker spool up, and 10 extra hp any day of the week. 5psi of ebp and 50egts won't make/break anything... but the quicker spool up is very noticeable.
I'm an idiot. I remember now. Thanks!Yep... just need to find time to make a post about it, upload photos, and type up a write up. We did post something on facebook if you wanna check it out. We compared stock vs 38r vs 63/68 vs 63/73
https://www.facebook.com/KCTurbos/posts/2240014902876744
Not sure if I should continue posting all the bigger turbo testing here... or start a whole new thread.
Yep... just need to find time to make a post about it, upload photos, and type up a write up. We did post something on facebook if you wanna check it out. We compared stock vs 38r vs 63/68 vs 63/73
https://www.facebook.com/KCTurbos/posts/2240014902876744
Not sure if I should continue posting all the bigger turbo testing here... or start a whole new thread.