And as we ALWAYS discuss, dyno numbers are pointless unless there is a baseline number to go off of. I'm a much bigger believer in the calculator than I am any dyno numbers. The ONLY dyno that has ever been truly close for me was David Dunbar's Dynojet 248C. Uncorrected, my 6.4 made 594 on his dyno. A few weeks later the calculator said 592. Craig's dyno numbers and the calculator are 62 HP different. Do you believe the dyno in this case or do you believe what truck showed at the track?
Honestly, knowing as many 6.7's as I've dynoed. I've never seen one dyno as much as its track times show. Just saying. You do realize, drivetrain efficiency is a variable that a track time/hp calculator doesn't equate right? A 6.4 or 6.0 seems to be very spot on with the PSA calculator. The 6.7's ALWAYS show more hp by times than they do one the dyno.
I mean, do you believe the guys with a stock "tuned" 2011 that shows 550 hp by mph?
No, me neither.....
Like I stated, it just goes to show the efficiency of these transmissions. Which is truly awesome!
There's been a bunch of 2015's dyno in the 520-540 range with stock turbos. I'll believe the average over a single track time given my history with these things.
Either way. Like I said. Awesome times.
Let's not look into this too hard.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk