Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Karls03, post: 584451, member: 4818"] [url]http://www.sdtrucksprings.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=6706[/url] [FONT="Comic Sans MS"][SIZE="3"]This is a real basic design, but I don't know how/if it would interfer with an over load spring. I would have done this myself, but I have a 6 inch lift spring requiring additional fabrication to the vertical mount. Anyway, the logic here is that it is harder to pull this bar apart than it is to taco an under rider traction bar. Hence the smaller diameter of this traction bar. I am NOT saying that an OUO or PMF bar is going to taco, I am saying this set will work without compromising ground clearance, ie a stock ride height truck. The earliest use that I have seen of these are on the 65/66 GT350 Mustangs. They were very popular on lifted trucks through the 80s. I can only speculate that the wiener measuring of having a big ol'honkin under rider traction bar is why they are not as popular now. Because of my lift springs, and my lack of fab/welding skills, I bought Pro Comp traction bars, easy to bolt on and no more axle hop. Although they did run about $450.[/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

No Limit

excursion_bumper

elite_intake_manifold

IMG_20140915_092136

SprintPhoto_dcprys

a92d678a

dwmaloney's F450

17_Intake_Product_Photo

IMG_20141025_125543719

FB_IMG_1524919687889

Latest posts

Do not recommend Choate Engineering
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Yesterday at 10:22 PM
Newly Enlisted
A few turbo questions and a rant
- Latest: ghohouston
- Yesterday at 9:41 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
Truck slipping into 4th
- Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
- Yesterday at 9:26 PM
6.7 Tech
O
2011-2016 Radiator upgrade
- Latest: OtisCreekConstruction
- Yesterday at 6:17 PM
6.7 Tech
Performance shops
- Latest: DEEZUZ
- Tuesday at 8:42 AM
7.3 Performance

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 649 (members: 1, guests: 648)

Top