thuglike
Active member
I would be more concerned about the trq curve rather than the hp one.
I would be more concerned about the trq curve rather than the hp one.
A dodge pulling a ford is never a good picture. Just give it time. I'm sure you'll return the favor.
It seems quite a few guys running a 468 with nozzles in the 250/200 to 350/200 range have blown motors recently.
No one that I know of has broken a billet rod motor on that setup.
The 350/200 setups that I know that have broke have been on stock forged rod motors. These are 600+ motors on fuel and 700+ on spray. (On stock rods)
I'm curious what Jody meant by seeing a trend. I'm building a new motor that I don't want to be part of a "trend".
I would be more concerned about the trq curve rather than the hp one.
I agree the billets are holding at that power.
I keep seeing a trend of Swamps tuning with blown motors. I am not sure if it is the tuning or something else. I know that many other factors come into play but most like to blame the tuning.
Jody
Better to blow the rods out at 600 than at 300
Engine calibrations/chip tuning written for large(r) single turbochargers are going to make much more torque with a small(er) turbocharger...given that size injector.
..but at the end of the day, it's a gamble with forged rods.
As soon as a smaller, more responsive, turbocharger is thrown into the mix...the same chip programming is going to be brutal, when the boost comes on hard at 1800rpm, as opposed to 2300rpm.
Aside from our tuning, the success we've had in keeping stock/forged rod engines together at pretty respectable hp levels also comes from us (generally) selling packages that include large(r) turbochargers.
I'm no expert but I believe too that billets will hold a set of 250s together. I've been wrong before though