Bought a new project..check er out..

Nic · May 25, 2012

MAC said:
Duramax.

oh man...this thread is gonna get interesting..Your avatar SCREAMS duramax ..sure looks like something he would say

ointlaugh:

MAC · May 25, 2012

You know you like the idea.

Nic · May 25, 2012

LOL :flipa:

MAC · May 25, 2012

That's ok, these things take time.

Nic · May 25, 2012

i see that..

legionxxii · May 25, 2012

windrunner408 said:
Ok this is incorrect here. I know of Adrian and his turbos have NOT made 500hp on stock injectors (at least as of yet anyways on either a dyno or a track) so please dont go throwing out wrong information. He also only has 2 stages of turbos so far and is trying to develop a third. The fuel economy reports are accurate with the looney wild and yes they do have great response. These are great turbos so far but they have a little ways to go to make sure they are proven to deliver and hold up.

Thank you for the correction I worded that wrong he is still in works on the stage 3 yes.

http://www.powerstroke.org/forum/6-...970-mad-tubro-werks-dyno-test-stage1-2-a.html

I was going off corrected numbers on the stage 2. Non corrected 485hp with corrections 515-520hp. Still none the less those are great numbers with stock injectors

RazinCain · May 26, 2012

Id go with the 6.0

AND Id shorten the frame and make a shortbed outta that thing. Like this, but Id put on some diffrent wheels...

windrunner408 · May 26, 2012

legionxxii said:
Thank you for the correction I worded that wrong he is still in works on the stage 3 yes.

http://www.powerstroke.org/forum/6-...970-mad-tubro-werks-dyno-test-stage1-2-a.html

I was going off corrected numbers on the stage 2. Non corrected 485hp with corrections 515-520hp. Still none the less those are great numbers with stock injectors

I got ya. Yes I am fully aware of this thread but IIRC, folks use the uncorrected values. Either way you are right in that these are VERY impressive results for sure.

BlueWaffle · May 26, 2012

windrunner408 said:
I got ya. Yes I am fully aware of this thread but IIRC, folks use the uncorrected values. Either way you are right in that these are VERY impressive results for sure.

if that's the case....i had a run with my 190's/pmax that put down like 410 uncorrected. tis why dynos are nothing but a crapshoot.

legionxxii · May 26, 2012

Or a crap dyno maybe thats really bad numbers

PSM_Kid · May 26, 2012

My vote would be 6.0. It's an easier build for that truck although 6.4's are awesome motors no doubt that can make a retarded amount of power (wish I owned an 08-10). I just wouldn't be up to swapping one in a pre 08MY truck without a complete donor truck.

I also put in a vote on shortening the wheelbase! Reg cab short beds look so good!

Beans71086 · May 26, 2012

Crazy 6 leaker ppl

ointlaugh:. My vote is 6.4, you only paid $500 for the chassis so spend a lil extra coin and swap a real motor in that thing. :redspotdance:

Nic · May 27, 2012

^^ if i could find a good deal on one i will..just dont want the truck with it

Nic · May 27, 2012

RazinCain said:
Id go with the 6.0

AND Id shorten the frame and make a shortbed outta that thing. Like this, but Id put on some diffrent wheels...

^^ i like it! were planning on doing the shortbed..so if yall know anybody who wants a white 8ft bed with no tailgate, let me know!

Dustball8504 · May 27, 2012

Beans71086 said:
Crazy 6 leaker ppl ointlaugh:. My vote is 6.4, you only paid $500 for the chassis so spend a lil extra coin and swap a real motor in that thing. :redspotdance:

That sounds fine and dandy until he tries to swap it in and EVERYTHING needs changed. It's a lot harder than just bolting it in and turning the key lol.

On this truck I'd go 6.0.