Swamps 7.3 common rail

Dieselfever

New member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
Location
Beaverlick, KY
He might have been sarcastic? Saying, that is 2.6 power. None the less that would make a 7.3 a good runner and more competitive in either class than they are now :ford:
 

JD3020

Active member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
4,002
Reaction score
0
Location
Farmersville/Dayton, Oh
He might have been sarcastic? Saying, that is 2.6 power. None the less that would make a 7.3 a good runner and more competitive in either class than they are now :ford:

Yep, except for the mechanical 7.3's. Which for some reason they seem to get built, pulled some, then are never seen again. :shrug:


Be interesting to see what improvements they make to squeeze some more power out. Aside from head flow, i don't see why a CR7.3 couldn't make the same, or more power than a 6.6
 

01PSD

New member
Joined
Sep 30, 2011
Messages
4,255
Reaction score
0
Location
Smithfield, NC
Yeah Tommy Hassler's version. Haven't heard of that problem on the dyno with Scotty's though... interesting. Not saying it hasn't happened
 

02BigD

New member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
3,255
Reaction score
0
Location
Coastal NC
There's a huge difference between dyno pulls, and yanking 40k behind the truck for 300 feet.
 

02BigD

New member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
3,255
Reaction score
0
Location
Coastal NC
*sigh*.

Technically I was referring to the amount of time that the rails were being subjected to the high pressures pulling vs making dyno runs with my post. I was simply using the sled as a metaphor.

Then again, maybe Tommie is commanding a boat load more rail pressure than Swamps is. Doubt it but.. Dunno...
 

Powerstroked162

On Da Juice
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
10,069
Reaction score
0
Location
Wa. State
*sigh*.

Technically I was referring to the amount of time that the rails were being subjected to the high pressures pulling vs making dyno runs with my post. I was simply using the sled as a metaphor.

Then again, maybe Tommie is commanding a boat load more rail pressure than Swamps is. Doubt it but.. Dunno...

Lol I was gonna say something to him but gave up before I started


.
 

Powerstroke Cowboy

Well-known member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
4,452
Reaction score
177
Location
Montana
*sigh*.

Technically I was referring to the amount of time that the rails were being subjected to the high pressures pulling vs making dyno runs with my post. I was simply using the sled as a metaphor.

Then again, maybe Tommie is commanding a boat load more rail pressure than Swamps is. Doubt it but.. Dunno...

I see your point. I thought you were referring to the weight.. I was like?????? The thought did run through my mind but I figured since you did not say it you did not mean it like that.

Does anyone know whos are what rails they are using? The 6.4 dont seem to have trouble...




Steve....... :D
 

Powerstroke Cowboy

Well-known member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
4,452
Reaction score
177
Location
Montana
In a FB post he said 50k psi.... kind of threw the :bs: flag in my head but idk.

IF that is the case then i can see why. BUT that seem a little unlikely.. In any case 50K PSI is high. There is systems out there that are being tested that do 60k But never heard of it in a automobile yet.


For??????
 

Latest posts

Members online

Top