https://www.foxnews.com/auto/2020-ford-f-series-super-duty-debuts-new-7-3-liter-v8
I'm in love with the Dually facelift....
I'm in love with the Dually facelift....
Last edited:
So far, has not been so good, from what weve been seeing. Hopefully they changed something to make it "heavy duty"...I’m very skeptical of this 10 speed trans. But guess time will tell.
So far, has not been so good, from what weve been seeing. Hopefully they changed something to make it "heavy duty"...
Weve seen several mustangs and f150s with the trans completely trashed in them, with fairly low miles. One mustang had almost 1000, I think the most miles on one thats been in had around 35-36k, and that was an f150.
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
So far, has not been so good, from what weve been seeing. Hopefully they changed something to make it "heavy duty"...
Weve seen several mustangs and f150s with the trans completely trashed in them, with fairly low miles. One mustang had almost 1000, I think the most miles on one thats been in had around 35-36k, and that was an f150.
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
I’m very skeptical of this 10 speed trans. But guess time will tell.
So far, has not been so good, from what weve been seeing. Hopefully they changed something to make it "heavy duty"...
Weve seen several mustangs and f150s with the trans completely trashed in them, with fairly low miles. One mustang had almost 1000, I think the most miles on one thats been in had around 35-36k, and that was an f150.
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
The new 7.3 is aimed directly at diesel sales. They're going for low end torque with it. It should be a great option for those that only tow occasionally. Mileage-wise and the cost difference between gas and diesel means it should be more economical for those that don't have a trailer hooked up every day.7.3 is just gonna drive up the sales of diesel trucks lol. The 6.2 already sucks, and while the 7.3 may put up decent power numbers the fuel economy is gonna be horrible and the 6.7 is sure to put up better power numbers.
The 6.2 is a great engine but compared to a 6.7 it just doesn't make sense to me, the gas engine just isn't worth it. The cost of fuel averages out and the diesels hold up and tow better.
I'm not wild on the fogs or the slant on the lights. I like the idea of the grille, however.
More gears isn't always better, ford should have learned from GM. The 8 speed sucks and the 10 speed isn't much better.
6.2 is not a great engine, sorry. It's a flaming pile of chit.7.3 is just gonna drive up the sales of diesel trucks lol. The 6.2 already sucks, and while the 7.3 may put up decent power numbers the fuel economy is gonna be horrible and the 6.7 is sure to put up better power numbers.
The 6.2 is a great engine but compared to a 6.7 it just doesn't make sense to me, the gas engine just isn't worth it. The cost of fuel averages out and the diesels hold up and tow better.
I'm not wild on the fogs or the slant on the lights. I like the idea of the grille, however.
More gears isn't always better, ford should have learned from GM. The 8 speed sucks and the 10 speed isn't much better.
The new 7.3 is aimed directly at diesel sales. They're going for low end torque with it. It should be a great option for those that only tow occasionally. Mileage-wise and the cost difference between gas and diesel means it should be more economical for those that don't have a trailer hooked up every day.
I've seen elsewhere that Ford claims it's "turbo ready." It's basically a big block LS. There are a lot of people hoping Ford doesn't screw it up.
The 10 speed transmission was developed in a collaboration with GM.
1-2 mpg difference. With gasoline being $0.50-$1.00 per gallon cheaper, how many miles do you need to drive to make up the difference in initial cost? Remember, you have more maintenance costs with the diesel as well (oil changes, fuel filters, etc).I drive 102 miles on the interstate 4 times week (commuting there and back twice.) I’ve done enough trips to get some decent numbers (2 and a half years doing it now, and at least 20 trips in each vehicle.)
In my 6.2 the best I did was a bit over 14, the dieted 6.4 does 17-19 depending on how much of a hurry I’m in. Stock 6.7 does 15-16.
6.0 vortec (lq4) did 15.5 routinely but it was in a half ton suv, not a 3/4 ton pickup.
That’s why I say the 6.2 isn’t great on fuel. Haven’t trailered enough with the pickups to know what the numbers look like loaded but I’m sure the gap is similar if not wider.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The 6.2 is a great engine but compared to a 6.7 it just doesn't make sense to me, the gas engine just isn't worth it. The cost of fuel averages out and the diesels hold up and tow better.