Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="mikeeg02, post: 1399498, member: 24194"] I think I have a pretty good understanding of the concept we are trying to accomplish, though I do appreciate the further explanation. Where I don't understand is what part of the equation is lacking. Whether there isn't enough resolution to accomplish this on the tuning side, or if it comes down to the probably "sloppiest" part of the injector, which IMO should be in the in the solenoid. While I think there is good info for to be had in this thread, I think there are two trains of thoughts on "oversizing" injectors. For me, when someone says they want a hybrid 200cc, 80% nozzle I think to myself, why oh why wouldn't you just get a 238 or 250 with the same size nozzle, and run a tune that only uses ~200cc and have a future if you decide later "D@mn, I wish I had more fuel to play with" They are basically the same price(if not exactly), and since the 238 or 250 can be limited on pulse width to ~200cc of fuel, why wouldnt you do that? Can you see a reason why that thought process is foolish? (Or does that thought process go back to the user ending up running too hot of a file and complaining about EGTs?) [/QUOTE]

Verification

Random media

2017 Headliner Re-Do

Wellheads

Got the Decals

1000_1

gopro

gopro

New Two Tone

'07 5.9 Cummins

Capone

truck31

6.7Intake

Latest posts

I
Tuning the 7.3 in current times
- Latest: INFRNL
- Yesterday at 11:35 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
2000 f350 dually lariat
- Latest: Powerstroke Cowboy
- Yesterday at 11:35 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
Best turbo upgrade in current times?
- Latest: 6.0 Tech
- Yesterday at 11:01 PM
7.3 Aftermarket
6.4 s366.73 91 turbo questions
- Latest: Blitzin247
- Yesterday at 7:09 PM
6.4 Tech
I
6.0 fan on OBS Results....
- Latest: INFRNL
- Yesterday at 2:51 AM
94-97 Aftermarket

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 1,080 (members: 0, guests: 1,080)

Top