I need help with a dilemma on Shorty and turbos

[White_monster]

Tadd do regular max powers or high power x's. You know both setups will get you what you want.

 

[Matt]

I kinda figured they were a 62 vgt and 82mm, but wanted to be sure. I'd kinda like to see two 62's into a vgt like Kind said.

 

[Dustball8504]

Stock chargers with drop in Batmos FTW!

 

[taterthedog]

What would something that could do an 11.5 at elevation run at sea level? Rough estimate.

 

[gman1]

High power X or Max powers.
Then throw your Max power X,s on my truck! LOL

 

[Wayne]

11.5 flat at 7200# (regular cab, short bed) requires 776 rwhp. Dynos around here have 19-23% CF generally speaking, so if you were to add 15%, roughly compensating for altitude drop, it would go to 892 rwhp, giving you a 10.98. That's just bench racing, and simple math, so it's far from exact, but should give you a general idea. What's the correction factor most dynos use closer to sea level?

 

[Meniacal_Mark]

Gman, you wouldn't settle for used turbos on that beauty

 

[BFT]

What would something that could do an 11.5 at elevation run at sea level? Rough estimate.

Low 11's to high 10's

11.5 flat at 7200# (regular cab, short bed) requires 776 rwhp. Dynos around here have 19-23% CF generally speaking, so if you were to add 15%, roughly compensating for altitude drop, it would go to 892 rwhp, giving you a 10.98. That's just bench racing, and simple math, so it's far from exact, but should give you a general idea. What's the correction factor most dynos use closer to sea level?

Shudup nerd

 

[taterthedog]

Lol. Thanks. I thought it would be more of a difference. I guess though, half a second or so is quite a difference.

 

[Jeff@Spartan]

What's the correction factor most dynos use closer to sea level?

Uncorrected FTW bro!

 

[powerstroked08]

Tadd just get both, run it, and give me the set you dont wantoke::naughty:

 

[Fast-6.0]

I forgot to mention, I have a used set of high-powers and a used set of mpx. So......mp and hpx are not in the equation. Now what is the consensus?

 

[Crack85]

High powers limits n max achievable hp!!

 

[Jgon08]

I forgot to mention, I have a used set of high-powers and a used set of mpx. So......mp and hpx are not in the equation. Now what is the consensus?

I still want them high powers :toast:.That being said I'd try and max out high powers I'd like to see what they can do maxed out.

 

[bigrpowr]

I still want them high powers :toast:.That being said I'd try and max out high powers I'd like to see what they can do maxed out.

theyll make 1050 maxxed out.

 

[BFT]

The HP's will get it done, even at that elevation. You gotta remember, my CCSB (8400+) did 12.7 on 37's with no special tunes on stock fuel

 

[jdgleason]

Hpx ftw.

 

[Jgon08]

theyll make 1050 maxxed out.

Well If they do that well. I'd say that will be plenty to get it done then.

 

[Erikclaw]

Well from you last post, I would say HP's. My guess is that the 1050 was done with a healthy shot of juice.

 

[gman1]

I forgot to mention, I have a used set of high-powers and a used set of mpx. So......mp and hpx are not in the equation. Now what is the consensus?

If your intended goal is 11.5 in the 1/4 then high powers it is.