What about trying nozzle changes on whatever injectors you choose. I thought I read 190s. Try the 30%, 50%, and 75%. Wonder when the gains start to diminish
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
opcorn:
I agree with this idea!!!
What about trying nozzle changes on whatever injectors you choose. I thought I read 190s. Try the 30%, 50%, and 75%. Wonder when the gains start to diminish
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk
opcorn:
I agree with this idea!!!
We are going to be doing a variation, starting with 30%, no one really makes a 50%, so we may hone out the 30% to 50s.
Excellent post! Most people, it seems, don't understand the reasoning behind, or concepts of getting a nozzle sized properly. There are trade offs if you go further than ideal in either direction. I imagine I'm a lot like most people who turn up the power on their trucks. I still use it as a truck to haul and tow stuff, so a dedicated race vehicle is not practical. As cool and helpful as they are for pushing the envelope, and discovering new/better ways to set stuff up, true competition trucks are the minority.I believe any injector/turbo combo is physically possible to run with the right amount of tuning...
but does that make it optimal?
Could you have lower egts?
Are you getting the best atomization?
Why use 100s if 75, 50, or 30 could do the same thing at a lower temp?
Are you getting the best burn possible out of the fuel?
Does that make it easy to tow with?
In my mind it is all give and take. The key is to finding the most optimal combo. You want the longest most complete burn... without advancing the pulse width too much and increasing cylinder pressures. But you also don't want too slow of a burn by just dumping the fuel in there.
I am not arguing, doubting, or picking a fight... just throwing out some food for thought.
Has anyone dynoed 175/30 and 175/75 back to back to see if the 75s actually gain any power? Maybe 30s are already dumping all the fuel and 75s simply cause a less optimal burn???