Why the big push for single turbos over compounds?

[SEABEE08FX4]

LoL it was supposed to say "on here" too.

 

[TyCorr]

LOL

Ype mssipllede n a grmmar corrcetoin ptos.

 

[TY'S08FX4]

Becuz they r high...I dnt get why guys take their STOCK chargers off and spend 2-3k to put a 366 on and then r pissed wen it makes less hp and doesn't light til after 2 grand... this is my first pstroke. .have had 2 cummins trucks in the past 6 yrs..these compounds r tits idc wat anybody says...and for a little over a grand I'm throwin on a 72 atoms that's a direct drop in and it'll be a solid 650-700 on STOCK fuel...for a DD/cummins /duracrap killer on the street wat more culd a fella want...unless dedicated pullin 2.5 or 2.6..I wuldnt go single for nothin...heck the 75/59 combo is drop in and good for 8-900 with dual fuelers n nozzles...jus sayin

 

[HOOV3R]

72 atoms... Nuclear powered FTW LOLLOL

 

[Josh@DirtyDiesels]

72 atoms... Nuclear powered FTW LOLLOL

need more atoms.

 

[Stroked777]

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL