jdgleason
Active member
Back to back, my gear head tune was faster at the track, and actually made more power on the Dyno than idp did. I like the drivability in my gear head tunes better than my idp tunes fwiw
To everyone that says that my race file doesn't have as much low end. Has someone actually run the two different files with a boosted launch and compared?
To everyone that says that my race file doesn't have as much low end. Has someone actually run the two different files with a boosted launch and compared?
:whs:. i think people mistake pedal sensitivity and low boost fueling for "low end" power.
ya pc only unless your a mac guru i guess
yes they are emailed and u need sct software to upload
I have never heard of sending a tuner to the tune writer for better results
specially if u need fine tuning they will tweak via email files ,, got somone you can mooch a pc off of ?
The 310 has more "low end" because its much more sensitive. That's what I HATED about that tune. I like how the IDP and Gearhead tunes come out of a redlight better, it doesn't make you look like an idiot going through parking lots and hitting a bump either.
from my understanding the pedal sensitivity has nothing to do with low end power. the throttles electronically controlled and is set via the tuner(gh,idp,spartan ect) when and how the power comes on