Smoker Stroker
New member
To further make my point, this is copied directly from the RR website. In this sample, he didn't even try to cover up his use of Bobs trademark by just using the initials...he used Bobs full trademarked name. Sorry...but this just isn't right!
If you're talking about the text featured here: http://www.riffraffdiesel.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=RRD&Product_Code=170293&Category_Code=F731-TRB-CW You'll notice Riffraff uses the term "Wicked Wheels". Mr Riley holds the copyright to the term "Wicked Wheel" according to this: http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4008:8jlrlm.2.2 That's it and that's all. No one holds the copyright to "WW". You can't just copyright letters of the alphabet. If you could, I'd copyright the whole thing and start suing elementary schools.
You're missing the point. It's not about the part, it's about stealing another companies trademark or identity. "Wicked Wheel" is a trademarked name that belongs to DieselSite...PERIOD. Using that name to promote a product that wasn't purchased from DieselSite is a dick move! It's no different than when another company started the website "www.bulletproofyourdiesel.com"...they were trying to ride on the reputation and popularity of Bulletproof Diesel but were not selling BPD parts. That's WRONG! It's misleading and shameful.
Like when a company calls themselves "Innovative Truck Products" when another company already has that name. Or when a company calls themselves "Sinister Diesel" when another company already has that name? Its one thing to have a name that sounds like another company, its a hair shady, but outright copying an existing company name...
Thats like saying Pepsi cant call its soda Pepsi-cola, because Coke calls theres Coke-cola...
ZOMG! Conspiracy!
Last edited: