- Joined
- May 22, 2011
- Messages
- 15,240
- Reaction score
- 1
Oneturboforme - do you have pics of ur single setup? You aren't really known so I'd like to see your setup.
Basing off the info that idkillinit posted is that its not necessary to.have more clamping force with higher torque... I might have to dig up the old thread and see what math he used to get the values
It made sense to me at the time.
To be honest, I'm glad the fiasco has occurred. 99.9% of us, you included, assumed that we had H-11 studs in our trucks. I now know that I don't. Next time I buy head studs for a 6.4L, I'll actually know what I'm looking for and what to buy. I damn sure won't be spending $700 on studs that I can get for $450.
Quit flirting with meoke:
Exactly. Site says they will be sold below cost, so it may be a good deal. As far as Im concerned until there is data that proves "the tooling process makes them better"...they are rebranded ARPs sold for $200+ more. So basically a sale on ARP studs.
I thought they were 2 different types of materials with the same strength?
Wrong they are NOT arps..Diff lube, instructions/trq specs, etc...
So they are ARPs...with a different installation procedure
Joking right?
Man this is gonna start this tread again.... So a_1 studs are the same material as arp2000 they ate not h11s here the email I got back from them... Looks like someone is trying to upgrade a product to something its not...
Kyle,
Unfortunately, someone has caused some confusion on the particular product for which you are inquiring. The material of the current A1 Ford 6.4 ltr. head stud kit we manufacture is made from AMS6304 also know as 17-22A, as requested by our original distributor. This is the same material that ARP uses and renames ARP2000. Now for the torque, I am guessing that the 310 ft. lbs. you mention below that ARP calls out for their 6.4 head stud is a typo and you meant 210 ft. lbs. If not I honestly cannot give you any logical explanation for the 310 ft. lb. as that makes no sense to use such a torque for that stud. If the 310 ft. lbs. of torque is used my guess is that it would yield the ARP stud causing permanent stretch and making it a one-time use “torque to yield fastener”. That is only my opinion based on physical properties and logic but I cannot nor do I imply to speak for them. If you look at an older ARP catalog you will see that for their ARP2000 material, 220,000 psi in 5/8” stud they called out 208 ft. lbs. using their ARP moly lube, which seems reasonable. I can also tell you that their torque values have changed as their new “ARP ultra torque” assembly lube is less efficient, (not as slick) and requires more torque to achieve the same result of stretch / clamp-load, but even with the change in lube 310 ft. lbs. seems beyond extreme.
Finally, to help you with the performance of the A1 head studs, if you use our recommended lube, International Compound #2, you can torque the A1 Ford 6.4 ltr. head studs made from 17-22A to 205 - 210 ft. lbs. This will give you a substantial increase in clamp-load on the stud, compared to the 180 ft. lb. torque you mentioned and should eliminate any further gasket problems.
If you have any questions or we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us any time.
Don Trapp
Director of Sales