Clearly not.
No, it's the army where people like you dogpile on anyone who doesn't not share your exact point of view. Whether or not you chose to believe the "claims" that were brought up here, the fact that incorrect documentation has been provided in the past still stands. Perhaps if you had spent your own hard earned cash on injectors with documentation, only to find out later that the injectors didn't not actually match the provided documentation, you too wouldn't have so much confidence in the flow sheets from the manufacturer.
I don't know, neither have I accused them of doing so. Again, reading comprehension. I have quoted exactly what "Mindrunner" said, which is clearly the opposite of what you interpreted.
It seems we are all in agreement that injectors should be flow tested.
Please, stop making this so easy for me. No one has even remotely suggested that playing "musical injectors" as you call it is acceptable or good practice for businesses or customers. I am not even sure you read what people post. If you would like, I would gladly site examples from this thread to illustrate the difference between nutswinging and prodiving personal experience, since you clearly don't understand the difference.
You aren't suggesting that those involved in diesel performance, especially 6.0 performance, don't need to be educated about their engines or the parts they are installing, are you? I sure hope not. I hope you can agree that education about aftermarket parts is paramount for anyone wishing to modify their vehicle. If a person is unwillling to take the time to learn about their engine and the parts they plan to install, they have no business modifying their truck. They should take it to a shop, spend an extraordinary amount of money, and have the work done for them.
Perhaps you should step down from your high horse for a moment, and realize that all the big name shops were once "backyardigans" too. To think that a product is lesser quality because it doesn't have a fancy sticker and massive price tag is asinine. In the end it is up to the cusotmer to make sure that they are truly getting what they are paying for, that is why I don't think the recommendation for thrid party testing is unreasonable.